0 'Transformers 3' Spend US $ 30 million for 3D Effects

Label : movie | 0 Comments

Directed by Michael Bay seems to really give a total for best special effects for the third part of the Transformers. The film has the full title of 'Transformers: Dark of the Moon' is spending U.S. $ 30 million dollars just for the cost of 3D visual effects.

Although it is not easy to make, but the director was born February 17, 1965'm sure if the display effect in 'Transformers: Dark of the Moon' has a very good quality. Steven Spielberg-produced film was scheduled to be released in U.S. theaters in 2D and 3D versions on 29 June.

"I do not think everything will go well for (the movie) 3D. But this is suitable for 3D, and it is a way to change the experience of watching this movie, and it felt robots. I think it worked for this film," says Michael as reported by Aceshowbiz on Monday (5/30/2011).

The film, made at a cost of U.S. $ 195 million it is the sequel of 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen'. For a little peeks three-dimensional technology prowess in the film, trailers 'Transformers: Dark of the Moon' have been circulating on the internet.

'Transformers: Dark of the Moon' tells the story of Shia LaBeouf (Sam Witwicky) and its robot friends. When the mysterious events of the past erupt into the present earth, then the big war was inevitable. Actress Rosie Huntington-Whiteley will portray the character Carly Miller, Sam Witwicky's girlfriend.

0 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 - reviews

Label : movie | 0 Comments

Idea to the end of the adaptation of the story of Harry Potter adventure, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows split into two parts is a purely commercial reasons and not just the whole essence of the story from his novel to catch. This is unfortunately quite clearly what is given by director David Yates by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1. The film itself runs very well, but with a duration of more than 146 minutes, Yates too much on the first part of this story with many details that are not needed in the story, so ... The Deathly Hallows to be completed - Part 1 felt like a movie with the actual story short, but in such a long stretch of time to delivery quotas.

The story begins right where Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009) ends, where Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe), who are still in a state of mourning the death of his friend at the same time teacher, Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), is in custody friends to realize his dream of Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and his gang who intends to kill Harry Potter to avoid. Powers told Voldemort himself had become a kind of terror with strength not only to those who know the world of magic, but began the world of Muggles (ordinary humans), to penetrate and even has many lives. Effect of Voldemort himself is now strong enough to be able to enter government positions in the wizarding world.

There is only one way to express their efforts against Lord Voldemort in order to facilitate the antagonistic character elimination, ie by destroying five horcrux (pieces of Voldemort's soul), scattered in different parts of the region. The story of Harry's business with two friends, Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) and Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint), a Horcrux to find and destroy pieces of this story ... The Deathly Hallows to enliven - Part 1. Of course, among the stories there are a number of sections devoted to exploring the personal side of each character that increasingly makes the story of Harry Potter adventure getting busier, darker and more complicated than the previous series.

The biggest problem ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 is the inability of David Yates on the intensity of the pressure to keep the storyline of this film. Maybe this is not going to be a big problem ... The Deathly Hallows are - Part 1 duration much shorter than 146 minutes duration, but the duration, Yates seems too much to play with the emotions of the public by presenting the intensity of the instability - at a certain point audience will be confronted with scenes that can stimulate adrenaline and then exposed to different scenes with the intensity of the flat, parts tend to be laborious and time is longer.

This is actually not a new problem for the film franchise that has been aged for nearly a decade. Along with the age of the main cast, the story of Harry Potter adventure is released from the previous pattern popcorn movie can be felt in the Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001). The complexity of the lives of the characters in this story is clearly illustrated by the complexity of an increasingly complex storyline in each series. In combination with ever terpolesnya visual layout and other technical procedures in the franchise, Harry Potter adventure story grew into a franchise that seemed to want a little distanced from the public other than ordinary film fans the story of this novel. Of course, as some critics insinuated that the longer the more the Harry Potter series as a movie than as an art film that became a part of a franchise that is able to invite the attention and the public in general pulling feeling.

David Yates, in particular, took a part of the process of "growing up" Harry Potter story visually. Since sitting in a chair director Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007), Yates seems to know that many fans of this novel that every part of the story of the novel has become part of the movie version will. Unfortunately, Yates seemed to lack an understanding of how the fans of Harry Potter new release you without the audience seemed already in the hope that this franchise is a series that can entertain. As a result, issues rise and fall of the intensity of the tension between the plot of the story into an abyss that can not be circumvented in any work of Yates, and ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 is in fact more - especially in the middle of the movie.

Then the problem of the intensity of the story that's harder to maintain ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 is a very satisfying movie. As the film offers a variety of scenes high-voltage, "... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 is really a film that was great. Several scenes drama was also a positive influence on the development of each character in the way the story - particularly the three main characters of this movie. ... Through the Deathly Hallows - Part 1, soul and thoughts of Harry, Hermione and Ron get dug deeper, particularly Ron Weasley in this series seems to be more specific part of the character komikalnya show.

The duration of running 146 minutes does not mean that all characters can be properly accommodated. Actually it's bad for Ralph Fiennes, Alan Rickman and Helena Bonham Carter to see - which has a role with a very interesting character - displayed only in the part not enough. But it is quite understandable that ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 is a kind of taster for the second part will be described with a picture of the final story is epic and majestic.

Continuation of work that has ever existed since Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, David Yates, produced ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 in a first part of the end of the Harry Potter franchise. It is unfortunate if Yates apparently still not learned much from the mistakes of management intensity plot of the last two series he has directed. The problems arising from ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 comes to complex script belitnya this story in the third adventure story with the protagonists. Several details not seem too important for the intensity of some parts of this film was very slow, in contradiction with some other parts produced by the rapid flow of time. As a 'trailblazer' for the late arrival of a beautiful story ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 is an achievement that was very satisfying. However, when considered as a single movie, ... The Deathly Hallows - Part 1 is still at the stage where the movie was like throwing a variety of potential benefits of a quality casual film became.

0 Megamind

Label : movie | 0 Comments

Megamind and Metroman spend their lives trapped in a classic struggle against the evil of Nice Megamind always lose and end up in jail. To day, the evil Mega Mind's strategy is working and metroman destroyed. Megamind takes Metro City and revolves around a dump site. But he comes to recognize that evil is boring without someone fun to fight. The rest of the story is Megamind to come to terms with his true destiny and see and realize that circumstances can not always dictate your success in this life.

"Megamind" is the story of Nice against evil - or is it? The film begins with a nice blue baby is sent to Earth in a rocket by his parents for the child of the destruction of the planet. As the small blue infant is rocketing towards the earth, another child (who is good-looking) also heading towards the earth in a similar missile. Both children crash land on earth, but at different fate. The beautiful baby crashes into a large estate where he is adopted by a wealthy family and everything. While the little blue baby crashes in a prison and is approved by the prisoners who teaches him the ways of evil. Both children are very smart, but because of their circumstances, grows up to be a superhero-Metroman (voiced by Brad Pitt) and the other a villain - Megamind (voiced by Will Ferrell).

The story is the most complex I have seen in a kid's movie. There are many twists in the plot, and because I do not see the trailer, I did not see much of them come. But I think it is rare in an animated film (or movie where Will Ferrell is involved) to such a rich storyline were good and evil as shades of gray that can be influenced by circumstances and our own choices in life. because you grew up in a prison does not mean you need to have a villain raised in a palace means that you need a prince.

"Megamind" from the animated movies that has much more going on than meets the eye. The animation is great. The screens look real and seeing the movie in 3D is a must in case you need to get the best viewing experience to get animated. The end is fascinating with complex animations that are not of this world.

The children in the audience loved the obvious jokes and slapstick comedy, but there were plenty of humorous one-liners that only parents were laughing, because you had to have seen "The Godfather" references to understand the comedy. Both my son and I loved "Megamind" and give it a thumbs up.

0 "?" a movie from Hanung Bramantyo

Label : movie | 0 Comments

Hanung Bramantyo ability to explore mental problems (if you do not want religion to be called) should be recognized in any director, Indonesia Film Festival winner for Best Director in his own class on the other drivers on the Indonesian film scene. Unlike some other driver, who attempted the same theme to cultivate, and most end up with a dish so preachy impressed, Hanung films offers its own depth on these spiritual issues, but still presented as a contemporary film and dramatic light will slowly leave a clear impression of the significance of spiritualism to the audience without them realizing that they had a new perspective on the subject.

After the Enlightenment, which is one of the best Indonesian movie which was released in the year 2010, Hanung re-examine the theme of spirituality in the new film?. Unlike the films he made earlier ? not only the view of spiritualism on one side (read: Islam). With the theme that there are different views in the everyday social fabric of Indonesian society, Hanung this time seem to want to "remind" the public about the existence of these differences around them and "learn" it is not something that should be feared. The theme may sound cliché to hear that it's actually quite possible to be presented in the middle of the Indonesian people today.

Movie storyline is adorned with three stories from a series of characters who come from different cultural backgrounds and beliefs. The first is the owner of a Chinese family restaurant Chinese cuisine, the couple Kat Tan Sun (Heng Solaiman) and Jade Lim Lie (Edmay) and their son, Henderson (Rio Dewanto) files. While clinging to the Buddha as their faith, Kat Tan Sun has long been known as a soul that a high tolerance for other religions. This he used in all aspects of life, including his own son, who often have a different way of looking at life with him.

Then there are couples families Soleh (Reza Rahadian), an unemployed person who always try to ensure the success of himself and his wife, Menuk (Revalina S. Temat), which is one of the workers at the Chinese restaurant owned by Sun Tan Cat to prove. Soleh conditions are a cause of unemployment in the long run his own distance between himself and Menuk and often led to fights between the two. Then there Rica (Endhita), a widow who recently moved religions, with their children, Abby (Baim). Changes in the conviction that he was much derision from the surrounding community. Yet it did not prevent Surya (Agus Kuncoro), a man who tried to realize his dreams as a great actor, for the hearts Rica itself.

During his career, Hanung seemed to have developed in a way that a very good storyteller, not least in what he did over?. Despite the fact that many conflicts appear in a movie, Hanung actually able to bring these conflicts in a way penceritaannya flows. Using a medium pace,? appears to be growing together contain the passage of the duration of this film. Storyline that initially contains the introduction of the characters, then begin setting up the various conflicts and social messages Hanung wants his audience to know.

Bringing the theme is quite universal, the script works Titian Wattimena unfortunately nothing new in the plot to show. It is made? less successful to appear special. It is formulated with a choice of endings that seemed impressed forced to produce a solution to the problems presented by this film before. Options to redress scheme that clashes between the two groups and the scenes of the bombings that led to changing attitudes and perceptions of some of the characters seem so cliché and become the weakest point in the exposure Hanung?.

Just like the movies Hanung Bramantyo earlier works? filled with solid acting and good production department. In collaboration with Yadi Sugandi, Indonesian filmmaker who last year succeeded in creating beautiful images for Minggu Pagi di Victoria Park, a row of pictures that decorate each scene? so able to feel the eyes looking at him to spoil. TYA Subiakto Satrio also managed to good music that could fill each scene with the flow of emotions that match offer. Special TYA managed to music a series of variations of each culture and faith in this film inspired it. Varies, but together can be so beautiful.

Some filler line cast of this movie is the names of Hanung Bramantyo never worked with before. Not surprisingly, Revalina S. Temat Rahadian Reza and his understanding of what seems to be very desirable Hanung the characters they played. Although still found some weaknesses - resulting from the acting game Rio Dewanto, Barry Manilow and Endhita a few times seems less capable of removing the emotional game of their best - but overall the acting department? not disappoint.

After what is produced by Hanung Bramantyo through Ayat-Ayat Cinta (2008), Doa Yang Mengancam (2008), Perempuan Berkalung Sorban (2009) and Sang Pencerah (2010), it feels so natural that many people who Hanung seen how will handle a fairly complex script that was delivered?. The result, slightly lower than expectations. Road story?, Although not entirely bad, not something new and make this movie a distinctive look. Elections impressed ends also be forced to live in her own weaknesses?. Even so, with all the power of story, good production and the resulting Hanung acting department, it still managed to make? appeared as a film with a quality that is not disappointing.

0 The King's Speech

Label : movie | 0 Comments

The expansion of "The King's Speech" is simple and most people know, the principle story, both through history of the film promotion. Colin Firth plays King George VI, and those with a bad stutter battled for most of his life. Trying to stay away from the glare of publicity, Firth has seldom worried about rising to the throne if they has an older brother (Man Pearce), in line for this distinction. However, Pearce ends up more involved in an inappropriate romantic than the pronunciation of a nation. Firth woman (Helena Bonham Carter), meanwhile, has contracted an unusual speech (Geoffrey Rush), who breaks all the rules. Emphasis on equality with the future king, Rush and Firth are a cautious friendship. But if Firth finds its place in the monarchy as the Second World War threatened, they must unite the nation along with his inaugural radio address. Guess the way it goes?

Earlier this year when I started hearing raves about "The King's Speech" at the film festival circuit, I knew it was a film for me. I have long awaited her arrival for plenty of months and, as expected, it is a worthy hard work and well scripted. Smart, adult entertainment of this type only hits theaters around awards time and there is no denying that "The King's Speech" is positioned perfectly for the largest of the year competition. In an unusual small bit of bravado, David Seidler's scenario is fashioned as a feel lovely underdog story. That is right - King George VI is a brave survivor who must overcome adversity to the respect of his relatives and his people to win. It is an unusual tactic, , but I guess that is why so plenty of people react to the "The King's Speech" in a more personal way than before tales of royal history. The film humanizes the world leader in a very familiar way.

All in all, The King's Speech "is both witty and moving. It is a literate and well-made film, that I admired a lot. It did, however, occur as you would expect with small narrative surprise. But that is a tiny point that definitely overshadowed by the plenty of great attributes are present in the film.

Of work you can not beat the cast of "The King's Speech." Bonham Carter is a delight - both haughty and approachable. Rush is as solid as ever and Firth is great. Truth be told, I personally would have given Firth Oscar last year for "A Single Man" and earned Bonham Carter for "The Wings of the Dove" plenty of years ago. They will certainly be both in the walking again this year like Rush. Despite classification Rush in the supporting role section, however, not be fooled. It is clearly a leading role! Man Pearce is amusing as an older brother when they was about two years more youthful than Firth. And I need to see Derek Jacobi as an archbishop (comic because Jacobi also played a famous stutterer in the glorious historical mini-series "I, Claudius").

0 Crazy Little Thing Called Love

Label : movie | 0 Comments

Do you still remember the time when you start to feel attracted to someone and in love with him? The period where you do things to attract people to you like - from doing things like cheesy like all the things he likes to try a person for several of your personality for this show. Love is a strange power. For some people, love can give a bad influence. Fortunately, in many others, love to make a figure better for their loved ones are.

In Crazy Little Thing Called Love, a 14-year-old girl, Rose (Pimchanok Luevisetpaibool), for the first time feel the vibration of love in his heart to one of his senior, Chon (Mario Maurer). The problem with Chon a very handsome face - and combined with an attractive personality and is a great sport - Nam is not the only girl in school who falls against Chon. With a face and personality of the ordinary course Nam was not a favorite butt more that can win the hearts Chon. With the help of his friends, and a book with a variety of methods to get a man's heart, Nam began several severity of such an implement on its own. A change that is slow, unconscious Nam, instead making it a better than ever.

Yes ... The way the story Crazy Little Thing Called Love is very simple and often cheesy to be. Just simple and cheesy with the experience of someone when they have cases in the love for the first time. With the way the story is familiar, clearly the main advantages of this film lies not in the script writing department. Even so, the text of stories written by two directors of this film, Sakon Nakhon and after Putthiphong Promsakha Pokpong labeled for hot, not bad considering the way they succeeded in a simple and familiar story with a more comic elements back to find a new dialogue throughout the film, and of course, a love story that anyone who ever fell in love itself can become. Pretty sweet huh?

Like the kind of movie comedy drama about the transformation of an ordinary person tell an interesting character in the beginning to the end of the story, Crazy Little Thing Called Love also strives for the attractive side of his story as the main attractive has changed. Unfortunately, this effort can be said to be less so it can work correctly when the center of this film feels a bit boring compared to the previous section. Plot of additional stories about the teachers' Nam, Inn (Sudarat Budtporm), who surrendered to the attention of teachers pursuing other, less successful in the empty space in this film form and are often only felt like looping Nam love story, but comes from a more mature character.

Location of the great success of Crazy Little Thing Called Love in transferring the story is that this film's director managed to the ranks of actors who could very well turn every character that they bring, especially Pimchanok Luevisetpaibool Nam successfully image the nature and make it as a figure very pleasant character behind all the innocence of first love to know. Took a character in its own felt so alive with the support of three characters are always reliable companions in supplying various comedy scenes for the movie.

Unlike playing Pimchanok Luevisetpaibool young actor Mario Maurer is well suited to portray Chon, who was a favorite all girl at her school. Although it seems unnecessary acting ability that is too deep, Maurer appearance as Chon not completely disappoint. He also managed at least to the sensitive side of his character, that is the character associated with past problems, his father or his struggle in an attempt for his ability in the field of photography and football to prove.

As teen movies romance comedy drama by John Hughes in the year 1980, Crazy Little Thing Called Love are quite capable of telling a story of first love is familiar with the rhythm of the comedy is very entertaining. Length of reaching 118 minutes is a bit too long to remember a few scenes in this film was boring due to the implementation of the storyline that made excessive and tedious. A few extra characters and plot are less well developed, although each has

managed to cast a fairly good description of the character they played give. Not a masterpiece that is special, but successful enough to be a refreshing entertainment.

0 Tangled

Label : movie | 0 Comments

Tangled in the promotion was sinful. It was the only reason why I initially was not interested in this film at all, and is the reason why the giant majority of my friends still have no interest in it. Although earlier attempt by Disney to "return to the glory days," The Princess & the Frog, was well received by critics, was thought about a financial failure. They sold it as a warm Disney musical in the style of the classics, but apparently the potential audience is not interested. Clever ol 'Disney, trying to learn from their mistakes, select to go for the opposite tangled promotion. Bad idea! Now they have got even fewer individuals who have an interest! The promotion made Tangled (even the name gives it a cheesy, "edgy" feel) like this super-hip retelling of Rapunzel, filled with non-essentials and jokes without any warmth or heart. If that is what you do, you'll be pleasantly surprised in the event you have a chance tangled. I bet you do not even know it is a musical.

It is a freaking Alan Menken musical! The composer of all of your favourite Disney movies including Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and The Mermaid Little composed the songs for tangled! and he is still got it! Is that you get excited? Well what if I told you that, unlike the tone of the ads, Tangled is of the most moving, pretty, and joyful films of the decade? Now excited? You ought to be! Tangled is absolutely phenomenal! It is basically the strongest film since Disney Lilo and Stitch (2002). I would even say that at least in my mental top Disney films of all time "list. It is that nice. Forget The Princess and the Frog. Tangled is the actual return to what made Disney classics so fantastic and magical. Apparently it is not a lot to do with that hand-drawn as well They would have thought.

An elderly witch finds a magic flower that forever keeps her young. A dying queen soldiers find the flower and use it to cure her. The queen gives birth to a daughter, Rapunzel and the magic flower is passed to the girl. Healing power is embedded in the hair of the girl, but is lost when the hair is cut. The elderly witch steals the girl and locked her in a tower, as her protective father. They constantly use the power of Rapunzel's youth. The king, queen and single city dwellers to make lanterns in the night sky each year on the anniversary of Rapunzel's in honor of the missing princess. I loved everything about tangled from the moment it began. The serene tone was set immediately and seldom let go. It is a pretty film, rich in emotion and rich in visual beauty. The characters are lovable, the environments are pretty, the comic timing is spot-on, and all tied up in fantastic package Disney Music by Alan Menken's. This is what it is all about. Pure Disney magic. Pure joy. I was two times beaming the whole time. I can not keep in mind myself ever enjoyed a film this much. I'd say it is on the brink of perfection, if not an irritation. The last scenes of the film have no numbers. Characters go in to a song in the work of the emotional story high points, and yet in the finish, when everything is in a final emotional climax, They get nothing. I left feeling slightly underwhelmed because the finish appeared so lethargic compared to what other high points of Tangled felt emotionally intense. I have made peace with that gripe, and I am sure I will enjoy fine the second time, knowing what is coming. I think that would have eliminated much more impact if of the main melodies made last reprise

The story falters a bit in a few little places, but as a whole is very well told. Some little areas include the usual "true love happen overnight" phenomenon that apparently exists in the world of Disney animation. The area that I was two times disappointed in the relationship in query Rapunzel together with her fake father. They have established a thought-provoking dynamic. They know that Father Gothel intentions are purely egocentric. I mean he was freaking kidnapped the girl and is located on her eighteen years. They only see that there is genuine affection between the. Natural lake on the part of Rapunzel, but get the impression that Gothel They still have keen on her pseudo-daughter. I found their relationship very fascinating, but as the story, the focus moved further and further away from and by the time Gothel's original intentions have been revealed to Rapunzel, he's become a simplified villain. An icon. and Rapunzel was not torn in the least. They go directly from viewing her father as loving, as a complete witch, and seldom looks back. A lot for all the early development of the character of how they were attached. I think the story would have much more detailed and more profound as that followed by dynamic and came around full circle. I can understand that for a simple story, such as tangled, possibly they desired to focus a bit narrow andonly tell the public what was needed, while only hinting at supporting plot lines and dynamic. I thought I personally found them very fascinating dynamic, and think the general story would have been a tiny better if it followed through.

Sorry to be a lot time on the negative for such a great film make. I leave you with a list of any aspect of tangled that I loved!

Rapunzel-self! She is so cute! I can not! Most lovely Disney princess, hands down. A lot bravery. A lot persona.
-The animation! So smooth! So alive! It is among the most vivid CG animation I have ever seen. The characters faces have a lot persona. A lot expression. and the mouth! I kept staring at their mouths. I have seldom seen so pretty CG mouths move. The kind of blew my mind.
-The jokes! Oh, what a joke! The funniest seconds of my years involved and tangled a horse eating a piece of paper.
The side-kicks! Come on, make each animal sidekicks better animated! Maximus and Pascal will stick with me for some time.
-The songs and music! God, I did not recognize how much I missed Alan Menken's music. So nice. So timeless.
-The colors! A lot lavender
-The pace! This film had resigned ideal!
-Enough is left to the imagination! They get backstory, but it is not shoved in our faces. I think everyone over the age of 15 years will be able to piece together some deep backstory for the characters, someone below that age probably do not care if the characters come across a bit flat.
Glen Keane! Although the 3D, it is amazingly obvious how much influence Disney animator Glen Keane has had on the visual appeal of this film. I saw Glen Keane facial expressions on all the characters rock! on Maximus, the horse.
-The voice actors are the singers! No double-casting here.